A rising 10-year Treasury yield is usually treated as a straightforward warning for stocks: Higher borrowing costs squeeze consumers and businesses, while safer bonds become more competitive with equities.

Ben Emons, CIO of FedWatch Advisors, argues that the context matters more than yield levels alone. He sat down with TheStreet’s Caroline Woods to explain his reasoning.

In his view, a move toward a 6% 10-year Treasury yield could coexist with higher stock prices if it reflects durable economic growth, productive investment, and an orderly response to inflation rather than a Federal Reserve campaign that’s slowing the economy too aggressively.

That distinction leads him toward financials, energy stocks, and broad index funds, while making him more cautious about debt-heavy small caps and long-maturity bonds.

Emons is making a conditional market call, not declaring that every jump in Treasury yields is healthy. His framework asks investors to watch why yields are rising, how quickly they are moving, and whether short-term Treasury yields are climbing far above longer-term yields. Those details can separate a growth-friendly increase in yields from a rate shock that threatens a recession.

Here is how his strategy fits together, along with the risks that could break it.

Why a 6% 10-year Treasury yield does not automatically end a bull market

The 10-year Treasury yield is the annual return investors demand to hold a U.S. government bond for 10 years. It tends to rise when bond prices fall, and it influences borrowing costs across mortgages, corporate debt, and other parts of the economy. A higher yield can pressure stock valuations because investors have a more attractive alternative to equities. It can also raise financing costs for companies and households.

Emons’s argument is that the source of the increase matters. He sees an economy that remains strong despite rising energy costs and interest rates. If the economy is expanding and investment is increasing, higher Treasury yields can reflect stronger nominal GDP (economic output measured without adjusting for inflation) rather than a market losing confidence in the outlook.

As long as we’re getting an orderly rate rise, and we have a rate rise based on a strong economy, then even though there’s inflation, the stock market could go higher.

Ben Emons, when asked why Treasury yields could rise toward 6% or 7%

Emons’s qualification is central. An orderly rise means yields are moving higher alongside growth, rather than surging because inflation has become unmanageable or investors demand sharply more compensation to finance the government’s borrowing.

He said yields around 5% would fit an economy with roughly that same level of nominal GDP, while yields that move much higher than the economy’s underlying growth rate would create greater pressure.

The risk is that the Federal Reserve keeps raising its policy rate after inflation has already begun to cool. Emons pointed to 1999 as a period when technology investment, market momentum, and yields around 6% or higher worked for a time. In his telling, the trouble began when additional rate hikes made financial conditions too restrictive, slowing economic activity too quickly.

For investors, that makes the 10-year Treasury yield less useful on its own than when considered alongside the Fed policy and economic growth. A 6% yield alongside a resilient economy may be manageable in Emons’s view. A similar yield combined with accelerating inflation and increasingly restrictive policy could be much harder for stocks and the economy to absorb.

How AI investment, inflation, and Treasury supply could lift yields

Emons outlined several forces that could push Treasury yields higher. The first is inflation, particularly if energy market disruptions raise gasoline and other energy costs. Higher inflation can prompt the Federal Reserve to raise short-term interest rates, and investors may also demand higher yields on longer-dated bonds to compensate for inflation’s erosion of future purchasing power.

The second force is investment tied to AI stocks and related infrastructure. Emons said businesses have already begun investing heavily in AI, and that much more investment could follow. His proposition is twofold: Investment can require borrowing, and successful investment can strengthen economic growth. Both can contribute to higher Treasury yields.

Related: AMD CEO Su shares important supply news with stock market investors

A third force is Treasury supply, or the government’s issuance of bonds. More issuance can require the Treasury market to attract more buyers. Emons also described investors reallocating away from Treasuries and toward stocks or other bonds because inflation has reduced the appeal of bond returns. That reallocation, if it occurs broadly, would add selling pressure to Treasuries and push yields higher.

He also referenced technical levels, which are price or yield areas that traders watch because markets have reacted near them before. Technical levels can influence investor behavior, but they do not explain the economic cause of a yield move.

We just started investing with AI in the economy this year, it’s been a few hundred billion, there are lined up trillions more to come if that were to happen. So that will drive yields higher.

Ben Emons, when asked how the 10-year Treasury yield could reach 6% to 7%

The second sentence in that quote is a forecast, and the conditional language matters. Emons did not say the investment pipeline will necessarily arrive as expected or that it will inevitably drive yields to 6% or 7%. Investors considering that scenario should treat it as one possible chain of events: More AI investment could mean more borrowing and growth, which could lead to inflation, increased demand for capital, and higher yields.

Why energy stocks and oil refiners fit an inflation-focused portfolio

Emons calls stocks an inflation hedge, with energy stocks serving as his preferred sector for that role. His reasoning is that companies tied to energy can benefit when oil and fuel prices rise, although their performance still depends on operating costs, demand, refining capacity, and company-specific execution.

He is particularly bullish on oil refiners, the companies that process crude oil into products such as gasoline. Emons named Phillips 66, Valero, and Marathon as companies he believes could gain leadership if elevated oil prices support their profit margins. He argued that refining capacity has become important to fuel pricing and that refiners could earn more when oil prices remain high.

Emons said oil would need to stay near current levels or move above 90 for his bullish refining view to continue, while a retreat toward 60 could change the picture.

Related: ‘I think you should own it,’ Cramer says of surging energy stock

His proposed rotation is also selective. Rather than pulling money from AI stocks, Emons said both AI stocks and energy equities could work in concert. If he were shifting asset allocation, he said he would rather move money from long-maturity bonds into energy stocks. Long-maturity bonds are especially sensitive to changes in interest rates because their cash flows are farther in the future, so rising yields can cause their prices to fall more sharply.

That trade-off is important. Energy stocks can offer exposure to higher commodity prices, but they are not a substitute for the stability some investors seek from bonds. An investor using energy as an inflation hedge still faces stock-market volatility and the possibility that oil prices could decline.

Why Emons remains constructive on consumer discretionary and financials

Higher rates appear unfriendly to consumers because loans and credit can become more expensive. Emons takes a longer-term view: He said the Federal Reserve can use higher rates to reduce inflation, which could eventually improve inflation-adjusted income. In the near term, he identified gasoline prices, rather than interest rates, as the more immediate hit to household budgets.

His consumer discretionary thesis relies on continued spending. Consumer discretionary companies sell non-essential goods and services that people can postpone buying, including apparel, travel, entertainment, and luxury products. Emons said consumers have continued to spend despite higher gas prices and rates, although he also acknowledged that higher transportation and warehousing costs had constrained earnings growth for retailers and other consumer discretionary companies.

For investors who do not want to select individual companies, Emons said an exchange-traded fund, or ETF, could provide broader exposure to consumer discretionary stocks. The benefit is diversification, meaning one weak company has less influence on the portfolio.

Emons also favors financials. He said concerns around French banks had contributed to pressure on some bank shares, and he recognized that rising yields can affect interest margin, the difference between what a bank earns on loans and pays to fund itself. Still, he sees lending opportunities, open capital markets, trading activity, consumer borrowing, and deposit growth as support for bank earnings.

He described both regional banks and investment banks as beneficiaries of that backdrop, and cited Citi as a recovery story from the financial crisis while calling Goldman superior among investment banks. Those company references are his preferences, not a substitute for examining each bank’s lending exposure, funding costs, credit quality, and valuation.

Why elevated yields make small caps a more selective trade

A strong economy often helps smaller companies, but Emons urges caution with small caps while yields remain elevated. He said many small companies have borrowed heavily and may be more sensitive to higher interest costs than larger companies. That debt burden can limit the benefit they receive from stronger economic demand.

Emons said the Russell 2000 ETF may be a way to gain broad small-cap exposure after yields move higher and stabilize. The timing condition is important: His view was not that the Russell 2000 ETF is an all-weather answer for investors seeking a growth rebound. It was that reduced uncertainty around rates could make the risk more attractive.

Once that kind of gets over and the yields are higher and stabilize, I think then the small cap ETF will make sense.

Ben Emons, when asked whether investors should buy small caps with yields elevated

Emons’s caution offers a useful distinction for investors tempted to buy every economically sensitive group during a growth upswing. The strength of the economy and the cost of capital can point in opposite directions for highly indebted businesses. Investors considering small caps need to decide whether they can tolerate that rate sensitivity before assuming a stronger economy will lift the entire group.

How a yield curve inversion could change the recession outlook

Emons does not see a recession as the immediate base case if the economy stays on track and a limited number of rate hikes are priced in or delivered. His warning sign is a deep yield-curve inversion, which occurs when the two-year Treasury yield rises well above the 10-year Treasury yield. Investors often watch that pattern because it can signal that policy is restrictive enough to weaken future growth.

A yield curve inversion is a signal, not a clock. Emons said recession risk depends on how much tightening is needed to control inflation and how far yields ultimately rise. His framework makes the spread between short- and long-term yields more important than a single forecast for the 10-year Treasury yield.

Related: Nvidia and Micron are about to lord their successes all over Wall Street

He also expects the Federal Reserve to raise rates more than markets have priced. His model showed an October hike probability close to 30%, versus a market probability below 20%, and he said the market had priced three hikes while his reading of policy communications pointed to roughly five hikes into the following year. Those figures reflect Emons’s model and his characterization of market pricing at the time of the discussion.

The takeaway for investors facing higher Treasury yields

Emons’s strategy begins with diagnosis rather than an automatic bet against bonds or stocks. If Treasury yields are rising because growth and investment remain healthy, he sees room for financials, energy stocks, selected consumer discretionary exposure, emerging markets, foreign bonds, and broad index funds. Investors who prefer not to choose individual stocks can use index funds tied to the S&P 500 or Nasdaq for broad market exposure, according to his approach.

If yields are climbing because inflation is accelerating and the Federal Reserve is forced to tighten much more aggressively, the calculation changes. Emons said he would become bearish on stocks if oil reached at least 120 and inflation moved into a 4% to 5% range. He also identified a 10-year Treasury yield at 7% as an underappreciated market risk and said that outcome could arrive in late 2027 if oil and inflation rose substantially.

A practical decision procedure follows from that view. First, identify whether higher yields are arriving with stable growth or deteriorating conditions. Second, consider a company’s debt burden and sensitivity to financing costs before buying economically cyclical stocks. Third, watch inflation, oil prices, Federal Reserve policy, and the gap between the two-year and 10-year Treasury yields. Higher yields can coexist with a bull market, but Emons’s own case rests on conditions that investors need to keep testing.

Emons’s outlook is optimistic, but it is not a blank check for risk-taking. His preferred sectors depend on an economy strong enough to support higher rates and an inflation problem contained enough that the Federal Reserve does not have to push policy into a recessionary range.

Best Moments

Some or all of this content may have been generated by AI. While we strive for accuracy, AI can occasionally produce incorrect information. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.