Morgan Stanley breaks from the crowd on the U.S. economy | Official Website of Louis Velazquez, entrepreneur, finance guy and tech innovator

Bank of America CEO Brian Moynihan turned heads during a NewsNation debate, warning that sticky inflation may leave the Federal Reserve with no choice but to raise interest rates again later this year.

Moynihan argued that pipeline costs, energy pressures, and persistent household expenses will likely keep inflation elevated well into 2027 and 2028, with the soft-landing narrative running out of steam.

Morgan Stanley, though, just entered the debate with a completely different reading of the same economy.

Though BofA sees renewed tightening risk, Morgan Stanley believes recent data point in a very different direction. It’s a unique timing, as markets are already positioning around the next Fed move.

Morgan Stanley rejects Wall Street’s renewed rate-hike panic

Morgan Stanley just pushed back against a popular view that the Federal Reserve will have to resume tightening later this year.

The most prominent proponent of the view is Bank of America, whose CEO recently doubled down on three quarter-point rate hikes in 2026, lifting the policy range to 4.25% to 4.5%, as stubborn inflation lingers into 2027 and 2028.

More Fed:

Morgan Stanley says that the latest inflation data point the other way.

June headline CPI fell 0.42% month over month, while core CPI declined 0.02%. On a year-over-year basis, headline inflation slowed to 3.46%, while core CPI eased to 2.57%.

The bank estimates that June headline PCE fell 0.08%, while core PCE rose just 0.17%. It expects inflation to run closer to a 2% annualized pace during the second half.

That backs up Morgan Stanley’s out-of-consensus call for no Fed moves in 2026, followed by two quarter-point cuts in 2027, even as markets price one or two hikes.

For context, markets assign a combined 71.8% probability to one or two hikes and an 87.7% probability to at least one hike by December, according to Investing.com.

Morgan Stanley expects cooling inflation to keep the Federal Reserve on hold.

SimpleImages

Why Morgan Stanley thinks BofA may be wrong

Morgan Stanley makes a couple of claims on the economy, but the most analytical of them concerns tariffs.

Morgan Stanley forecasts that tariffs have bumped the overall price level by 62 basis points, which is close to its model’s 70-basis-point estimate. However, it lays out the case that tariffs have contributed nothing new to core-goods inflation since February.

If that pass-through is essentially finished, Morgan Stanley sees another 60 to 70 basis points of goods disinflation over the next year. Cumulative tariff inflation is also expected to flatten out 0.62 percentage points rather than pushing upward.

That, in many ways, goes against the “pipeline costs are still coming” argument from BofA. In my previous coverage, I acknowledged that BofA’s thesis weakens sharply if gasoline, services inflation, and wages cool, and Morgan Stanley is actually offering the hard evidence that this cooling might already be occurring.

Could AI become the inflation problem the Fed does not need to fight?

Interestingly, Morgan Stanley pointed to an unusual handoff developing within the inflation data.

Tariff pressures are fading, but AI-backed demand might be replacing part of it.

Case in point: Computer software and accessories have risen more than 20 percentage points since December, while strength in “other video equipment” underscores higher semiconductor costs.

The AI boom has been linked a bit too much, I’d argue, to capital expenditures (CapEx).

The steep increase in prices for the software, chips, and hardware needed to support that buildout is, in many ways, being ignored.

Tariffs eventually wash through the economy, but the big issue with AI demand is that it can persist as businesses grow data centers, software budgets, and computing capacity. In effect, the inflation source might be shifting from imported costs to sustained domestic investment demand.

Recent third-party evidence also supports that argument. Several company-level examples that offer a lot of clarity on the situation.

Uber: Exhausted its entire 2026 AI budget within four months as token-based software costs surged, Fortune reported.
Apple: Raised MacBook and iPad prices as AI demand tightened memory and storage supplies, according to Reuters.
Dell: Repriced PCs and servers almost daily to offset rapidly rising component expenses, Channel Dive confirmed.
Samsung: Increased Galaxy S26 and foldable-phone prices as higher memory costs pressured margins, according to Reuters.
Microsoft: Raised Xbox console prices by $100 to $150, citing sharply higher memory and storage costs, XboxWire noted.

Are markets already doing the Fed’s tightening for it?

Morgan Stanley doesn’t feel the Federal Reserve needs to respond immediately with a rate increase.

Its financial conditions index suggests markets have already delivered tightening equivalent to roughly a 39-basis-point Fed hike since Middle East hostilities began.

Of that, about 21 basis points have occurred since the June Fed meeting alone. Higher Treasury yields and a firmer U.S. dollar were the primary catalysts, while resilient stocks and contained credit spreads offset some part of the restraint.

Monetary policy also works through these same channels.

Rising bond yields raise borrowing costs, a stronger dollar weighs on exports and multinational earnings, and tighter financing conditions can efficiently slow down investment and demand without the Fed formally lifting rates.

Morgan Stanley’s argument is not about dismissing inflation risk, though, and it’s actually more about avoiding unnecessary over-tightening.

AI demand is keeping goods inflation elevated, but markets might already be imposing enough pressure to justify patience rather than another hike.

What does Morgan Stanley’s call mean for investors and consumers?

Naturally, Morgan Stanley’s outlook favors long-duration assets that typically benefit when rate expectations fall.

Growth stocks, REITs, homebuilders, and longer-dated bonds stand to gain immensely if the Fed stays on hold in 2026 and starts cutting in 2027.

Banks might see a lot less support from growing loan yields, though lower rates could eventually ease credit stress and improve borrowing demand.

However, the risk is that markets might price in relief too quickly.

If AI-related demand continues to keep software, semiconductor, and hardware prices elevated, inflation might remain uneven, even if we see tariffs and energy pressures fade away.

For consumers, a Fed pause prevents another immediate bump in variable borrowing costs, covering credit cards, adjustable-rate mortgages, and business loans. However, unchanged rates still leave financing expensive through year-end.